This one may be a little rough to read as I am going to try to do four beer reviews in one post.  I did not even know that these beers existed before Gregg offered me some bottles to evaluate, so I was curious to see how they tasted.  Though I only had them that one time, they turned out to be not that bad all in all.  Hopefully this rundown of the four with shorter reviews for each will make some sense.

For a Saturday set of reviews . . .

Brewery: Kirkland Signature (Costco) – contract brewed by New Yorker Brewing Co. in Utica, NY which I can only assume is associated with Matt Brewing Company.

Name: Amber Ale (AA) – German Lager (GL) – Pale Ale (PA) – Hefeweizen (H)

Style: American Amber Ale (AA) – German Pilsner (GL) – American Pale Ale (PA) – Weizen (H)

ABV: AA – 5.70%, GL – 5.50%, PA – 5.40%, H – 5.50%,

Tasting Notes: Stored in the fridge and served in a pint glass (AA and PA), pilsner glass (GL), and weizen glass (H).

Aroma: AA – Some malty sweetness, but mild overall.  GL – Light graininess, slightly bready, and light overall.  PA – Even, fruity hop aroma, and some sweetness.  H – Really mild, lightly yeasty/bready nose.  Tough to do back to back with really mild aromas.

Appearance: AA – Medium amber color.  Slight cream color head with moderate retention and some trail.  GL – Golden amber color.  Moderate, off-white head with good retention and a heavy trail.  PA – Light amber color.  Little, off-white head with decent retention and some trail.  H – Golden color.  Slight cream color head with good retention and a light trail.

Flavor: AA – Low toasted malt flavor and slight bitterness.  GL – Slight grainy flavor with low bitterness.  Very light overall.  PA – Medium, somewhat floral hop flavor with some malty sweetness.  H – Some malty flavor with light breadiness.  Not what I expected.  Difficult back to back with similar flavor profiles among them.

Mouthfeel: AA – Medium body and somewhat creamy with pretty high carbonation.  GL – Light body, moderate carbonation, and some crispness/bite.  PA – Medium to light body with fairly high carbonation and slightly crisp.  H – Light body with lowish carbonation and creamy with a slight bite.

Overall Impressions: AA – Really nice flavor (compared to others).  GL – Quite bland but refreshing.  PA – Pretty good hop flavors overall.  H – Strange to me for style.  Not bad and fine for hot weather backyard grilling, but certainly nothing special.  I do not know cost but I am sure it is likely a great value for what they are.

Grade: Probably start at B- and work down.

Ranking the four (best first):

  • Me – AA, PA, H, and GL
  • The Wife – H, AA, GL, PA
4032805663 7d5af45abe Kirkland Signature Beers

Not sure where the review picture is, but here is proof they were spending time with our broccoli.

 

Everyone drifts off in thought of other things on occasion.  I probably do it more than the average person or at least more than I should.  Today, I have decided to share some of the daydreaming I did the over the last few days since it was all about beer and brewing.

I figured that I could not really hurt myself with a rake, so I was able to let my mind process other things while cleaning up the yard for spring.  My mind would have been in another place as I raked leaves anyway, but the fact that I had brewing supplies on the way certainly gave me something to focus on.  Welcome to the obsessive part of my brain.

4251936343 7e59f944f6 Thoughts of Brewing

I can already smell the grains

It has been a few months since I have last brewed anything at home, so I have been anxious to get back into it.  Now that my reserves have been depleted and I have more than enough empty bottles, I am ready to jump back in.  After putting (too) much thought into it I decided that the next three batches will be:

  • Black Ale – Inspired by the imperial version I had at the FBG Beerfest
  • Hefeweizen – In response to requests by multiple parties and as a good base for fruit experimentation.
  • Saison – My first Belgian and to have ready by summer.  I missed brewing in time for a spring seasonal and would like to get on track for future seasons.

Since I have only two primary and two secondary fermenters, this presents a planning challenge for me.  I have learned lessons from having all the equipment tied up in the past and would like to make it easy on myself this time.  That and I need to plan out what to sanitize now, what I can wait on, etc.

4303195447 da572d10e1 Thoughts of Brewing

The empty bottles are waiting

Starting off I have to decide which one I brew first.  My initial thought was the Black Ale, but that presents a few problems.  I have plans to add some bourbon and vanilla to the secondary fermenter for that one and let it sit there a bit longer than normal (for me) before bottling.  So that would tie up a piece of equipment for more time meaning that I would have to wait to brew at least one of the others for a while.  Also it will be a pretty strong flavor and I don’t know that I want a Hefeweizen going into the fermenter after it.  Of course it would be cleaned and sanitized, but I am slightly neurotic like that.

OK, so what about one of the other two going first?  I have (at he very least) tentative plans to incorporate a new type of fruit (for me) into at least one of those batches, if not both.  That could very well mean that I split the batches after primary fermentation to get some fruit beer and some of the original, unaltered style.  So either way that would tie up both secondary fermenters for some time making the order of things more difficult to coordinate efficiently.

4213237659 47b99e1aaa Thoughts of Brewing

Splitting batches will be after primary this time.

With all of that under consideration, if the fruit component that I intend to use does not arrive or is not made available right away maybe the Black Ale wins by default?  Or maybe I just brew the Saison and forget about any fruit going into that one?  I suppose I could even go ahead with the Hefeweizen without the fruit.

4285320996 cb8bf88982 Thoughts of Brewing

Might need a replacement bottling wand to be safe.

I know I shouldn’t put this much thought into it, but I do.  Or at least when I have hours of yard work to do and plenty of time to daydream of more enjoyable activities!

 

Probably in part to celebrate the recent changes to the site and also because I am continuing to work through a stretch of Flying Dog reviews, I am inspired to dedicate another month to one of my favorite breweries.  I will not disclose which one it will be today, but in the next few days I will declare the brewery for the month of February.  Since the first try at this went very well and was a lot of fun, I am looking forward to doing it again.

On to what I think will conclude the stretch where I was working my way through a mixed pack of Flying Dog beers.

Brewery: Flying Dog Brewery (Frederick, MD)

Name: In-Heat Wheat

Style: (Hefe)Weizen

ABV: 4.7%

Tasting Notes: Stored in the fridge and served in a weizen-like glass.

Aroma: Banana aroma with a bit of spice and a light wheat/bready nose.

Appearance: Light gold to yellow color.  Two finger, white head that dissipates fairly quick with a little trail.  Appears clear with many visible bubbles.

Flavor: Faint banana with no noticeable hop bitterness.  A slight clove-like flavor that remains after a somewhat dry finish.  Relatively weak flavor overall.

Mouthfeel: Medium to light body with high carbonation that give some bite.

Overall Impressions: Refreshing, easy drinking, and light (maybe surprisingly so for a wheat).  Slightly more flavor as it warms a bit.  Good, but not great (whatever that means).

Grade: B

3775720610 05b3615dae Flying Dog Brewery   In Heat Wheat

Flying Dog Brewery - In-Heat Wheat

© 2010 A Night With The Hops "He was a wise man who invented beer." - Plato Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha